Overview of the Vulnerability
In April 2025, researchers identified a critical security flaw in the Erlang/Open Telecom Platform (OTP) SSH implementation, tracked as CVE-2025-32433. This vulnerability received the maximum CVSS score of 10.0, allowing unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable systems. This article provides a comprehensive analysis of the vulnerability’s technical mechanisms, affected systems, and remediation measures.
Technical Breakdown and Attack Methodology
Flaw in SSH Protocol Handling
The vulnerability stems from improper processing of SSH protocol messages. According to the research team at Ruhr University Bochum, attackers can send specific connection protocol messages before completing authentication. This abnormal interaction triggers logical errors in the SSH server, leading to memory corruption or buffer overflow.
Step-by-Step Exploitation
-
Initial Connection: The attacker establishes a TCP connection with the target SSH server. -
Protocol Manipulation: Sends malformed SSH messages (e.g., CHANNEL_REQUEST
orGLOBAL_REQUEST
) during the pre-authentication phase. -
Memory Corruption: The server fails to validate these messages, causing buffer overflow. -
Code Execution: Exploit payloads are injected through the overflow, granting control over the SSH daemon ( sshd
).
Affected Systems and Potential Risks
Scope of Impact
-
All systems using Erlang/OTP SSH library versions below 27.3.3, 26.2.5.11, or 25.3.2.20. -
IoT devices and telecommunications infrastructure (e.g., Cisco and Ericsson products) relying on Erlang. -
Edge computing nodes developed with the OTP framework.
Risk Assessment
Risk Dimension | Impact Description |
---|---|
Privilege Escalation | Full system compromise if the SSH daemon runs with root privileges. |
Data Exposure | Theft of sensitive data, including configuration files and encryption keys. |
Service Disruption | Potential denial-of-service (DoS) attacks or logfile tampering. |
Lateral Movement | Compromised edge nodes could serve as entry points into internal networks. |
Remediation and Mitigation Measures
Official Security Updates
Immediately upgrade to the patched versions:
-
OTP-27.3.3 -
OTP-26.2.5.11 -
OTP-25.3.2.20
Refer to the Erlang/OTP GitHub Release for detailed instructions.
Temporary Workarounds
If immediate patching is unfeasible, implement these measures:
-
Network-Level Controls -
Restrict SSH port (default: 22/TCP) access via firewall rules. -
Enable two-factor authentication (2FA) for SSH access.
-
-
Process Isolation -
Run the SSH daemon under a non-privileged user account. -
Use Linux capabilities (e.g., CAP_NET_BIND_SERVICE
) to limit permissions.
-
-
Enhanced Monitoring -
Deploy intrusion detection systems (IDS) to flag anomalous SSH traffic patterns.
-
Industry Expert Insights
Mayuresh Dani, Security Research Manager at Qualys, emphasized:
“Erlang’s prevalence in high-availability systems—common in telecom and IoT—makes this vulnerability particularly dangerous. Attackers could deploy ransomware or exfiltrate sensitive data. Organizations must prioritize patching internet-facing OTP services.”
Vulnerability Verification and Detection
Self-Check Procedures
-
Check Erlang Version: erl -eval '{ok, Version} = file:read_file(filename:join([code:root_dir(), "releases", erlang:system_info(otp_release), "OTP_VERSION"])), io:fwrite(Version), halt().' -noshell
-
SSH Component Audit: Some systems may update SSH libraries independently via package managers (APT/YUM).
Penetration Testing Guidelines
Security teams should:
-
Conduct tests only in authorized environments. -
Avoid deploying live exploit payloads to prevent system crashes. -
Use Erlang’s official detection scripts for validation.
Historical Context: Comparison with OpenSSH CVE-2024-25153
Key differences between CVE-2025-32433 and the 2024 OpenSSH vulnerability:
Aspect | CVE-2025-32433 | CVE-2024-25153 |
---|---|---|
Attack Complexity | Low (no authentication required) | Medium (valid credentials needed) |
Impact Scope | Erlang/OTP-specific implementations | General OpenSSH deployments |
Patching Difficulty | High (requires framework-level upgrade) | Medium (independent patch available) |
Long-Term Security Recommendations
-
Supply Chain Vigilance -
Require vendors to provide a Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) for IoT devices.
-
-
Runtime Protection -
Implement Runtime Application Self-Protection (RASP) to monitor SSH processes.
-
-
Threat Intelligence Integration -
Subscribe to Erlang Security Advisories and CVE databases.
-
Conclusion
CVE-2025-32433 underscores the critical need for securing foundational frameworks like Erlang/OTP. Organizations relying on vulnerable implementations should adopt a three-tiered defense strategy:
-
Rapid Patching: Apply security updates within 72 hours of release. -
Layered Security: Combine network segmentation with process sandboxing. -
Continuous Monitoring: Aggregate SSH logs via SIEM platforms for real-time analysis.
This analysis is based on the Erlang/OTP Security Advisory and researcher disclosures. Always follow official guidelines for remediation.